|
|
Post by krazykev on Jan 19, 2023 10:12:51 GMT -5
Security concerns was just another lame excuse to help sell the conference move to alumni. Just like travel costs and more time in the classroom. No serious person believes the doubleheader games are less secure than the standalone games. Please stop...there were issues...you didn't see it cause it happen in the back by the locker rooms...We hated working double headers... I like the separate days...MEAC was still doing the old way like high schools do for travel and money |
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 19, 2023 10:22:08 GMT -5
What were the security issues, Kev? And how were they uniquely caused by double-header games?
If you are not going to explain things in detail, dont bring it up.
|
|
|
|
Post by krazykev on Jan 19, 2023 10:28:12 GMT -5
What were the security issues, Kev? And how were they uniquely caused by double-header games? If you are not going to explain things in detail, dont bring it up. You have been told by a couple folk about it in this discussion of some issues...you just want to be messy and making seem that you know everything..I am not going into to detail and I have no reason to lie. Folk take what you say as the gospel and you don't know all that goes on...So don't say nothing happened security wise. |
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 19, 2023 10:35:19 GMT -5
So basically, you have no specific details to support your statement. As usual. We just have to take your word for it because you take photos.
This question was how are the double-header games less secure than the standalone games. You were the one who came on here and said there were issues. You are the only person being messy.
|
|
|
|
Post by krazykev on Jan 19, 2023 10:40:02 GMT -5
So basically, you have no specific details to support your statement. As usual. We just have to take your word for it because you take photos. This question was how are the double-header games less secure than the standalone games. You were the one who came on here and said there were issues. You are the only person being messy. The funny thing is you know that I know but, I am being messy... enjoy the rest of this discussion with everyone else..Have that same energy with other folk when you know they come on here and lie about stuff..See you tonight |
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 19, 2023 10:45:42 GMT -5
I know that you know what? You still haven't said anything. If you are not at liberty to talk about the security issues, then don't bring them up.
Nobody is forcing you to comment on this thread. We are just asking for clarity. How are the double-header games less secure than the standalone games?
That is a basic question.
|
|
A&T-roy
Official BDF member
Posts: 5,477
|
Post by A&T-roy on Jan 19, 2023 10:59:56 GMT -5
Security concerns was just another lame excuse to help sell the conference move to alumni. Just like travel costs and more time in the classroom. No serious person believes the doubleheader games are less secure than the standalone games. Why do you believe travel costs and more time in the classroom were "lame" excuses? |
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 19, 2023 11:02:14 GMT -5
Because those same issues exists now that we are in the CAA and the administration is no longer voicing concerns about it.
It was just a convenient talking point used to justify our move from the MEAC.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2023 11:56:05 GMT -5
Security concerns was just another lame excuse to help sell the conference move to alumni. Just like travel costs and more time in the classroom. No serious person believes the doubleheader games are less secure than the standalone games. Well, Alumni could just not buy tickets to express their displeasure. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2023 12:00:16 GMT -5
I know that you know what? You still haven't said anything. If you are not at liberty to talk about the security issues, then don't bring them up. Nobody is forcing you to comment on this thread. We are just asking for clarity. How are the double-header games less secure than the standalone games? That is a basic question. It’s pretty common sense that sheeet happens in that hallway behind the reserved bleachers that connect the locker rooms. I remember being back there years ago, as there are public restrooms down there and benefits of having media passes for the newspaper and yearbook, where some scuffles between players and trainers of different teams. Luckily, from what I saw, it didn’t blow up and was quelled. With separate game days, we don’t need AggiePD and security in that back corridor. |
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 19, 2023 12:10:32 GMT -5
With separate game days, we don’t need AggiePD and security in that back corridor. What would prevent the same issues from happening during standalone games? |
|
|
|
Post by krazykev on Jan 19, 2023 12:30:01 GMT -5
With separate game days, we don’t need AggiePD and security in that back corridor. What would prevent the same issues from happening during standalone games? With no more doubleheaders....the Home and visiting team locker rooms are not beside each other anymore...Now on separate ends |
|
bluehaze
Official BDF member
Posts: 6,414
|
Post by bluehaze on Jan 19, 2023 12:39:24 GMT -5
What would prevent the same issues from happening during standalone games? With no more doubleheaders....the Home and visiting team locker rooms are not beside each other anymore...Now on separate ends That was specifically said by the AD. And it makes complete sense. There is a big difference between holding people accountable and pretty much calling them liars. This board crosses that line way to much. |
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 19, 2023 12:50:31 GMT -5
And there is a big difference between calling someone a liar and asking for specific information to verify their claims. Reading comprehension still appears to be a lost art on this board.
People who make decisions often exaggerate their concern level to make some issues appears more critical than they really are. The concerns about travel costs and student's time away from the classroom immediately come to mind.
If we are having a discussion about policy, let's talk specifics and not just theoretical.
|
|
saabman
Official BDF member
Posts: 12,780
|
Post by saabman on Jan 19, 2023 13:24:48 GMT -5
Security concerns was just another lame excuse to help sell the conference move to alumni. Just like travel costs and more time in the classroom. No serious person believes the doubleheader games are less secure than the standalone games. Why do you believe travel costs and more time in the classroom were "lame" excuses? The question is "No serious person believes the doubleheader games are less secure than the standalone games" . If any security issues are to be had I would think it would be from the fans or outside interest and not the competing teams regardless if it's a doubleheader or standalone games . But I do agree with Thrilla about the travel costs and classroom time being a "lame excuse " . |
|
