Aggie77
Official BDF member
Member Since: September 2004
Posts: 5,571
|
Post by Aggie77 on Dec 21, 2009 13:34:59 GMT -5
yeah, that clearly expains why we shot 4.7% from the floor... I'm not sure what your point is regarding 4.7%. I assume that's our 1st half shooting %. Are you implying that we were in better condition in the 2nd half because we shoot a higher %, than at the start of the game?
|
|
Freeze
Official BDF member
Posts: 2,342
|
Post by Freeze on Dec 21, 2009 13:36:03 GMT -5
Thrilla,
Can you please step in as a moderator and send Oleschool a pm or something. He needs to log off for a while....a long while.
SEC Champions: 2000-2009
2000: Tennessee/Georgia 2001: Tennessee 2002: Tennessee 2003: Tennessee 2004: Tennessee 2005: LSU 2006: LSU 2007: Tennessee 2008:LSU 2009: Auburn
LSU final four trips in the last decade: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008.
In the last decade, LSU has had a NCAA tournament seed of four or higher SEVEN out of the last ten years.
Programs like Vanderbilt, Auburn, and Georgia have had some success in this conference but anyone with a brain (which actually may exclude you) would tell you that Tennessee and LSU have been the top two programs in the SEC over the last ten years.
BUT MOVING ON.....look Oleschool, the whole reason that I came in to this thread to clown your moronic excuse about conditioning being the main reason we got blown out by the LSU Lady Tigers is to show you...how MORONIC that is. You don't need to find excuses for why we got blown out by LSU....BECAUSE IT'S LSU YOU CLOWN....we were going to get blown out anyway. If you would feel better about getting blown out by 20 by the Lady Tigers and would feel that that is a better measurement of how well conditioned we are....then I will go ahead and let you make that MORONIC argument. Just please, for the sake of your own sports credibility and to prevent you from not being ridiculously clowned....DON'T TAKE THIS ARGUMENT ANYWHERE BEYOND THIS INTERNET SITE.
Thanks for playing.
|
|
bluehaze
Official BDF member
Posts: 6,000
|
Post by bluehaze on Dec 21, 2009 13:40:43 GMT -5
yeah, that clearly expains why we shot 4.7% from the floor... I'm not sure what your point is regarding 4.7%. I assume that's our 1st half shooting %. Are you implying that we were in better condition in the 2nd half because we shoot a higher %, than at the start of the game? I guess Bibbs had them running suicides at halftime ;D
|
|
Freeze
Official BDF member
Posts: 2,342
|
Post by Freeze on Dec 21, 2009 13:44:02 GMT -5
I'm not sure what your point is regarding 4.7%. I assume that's our 1st half shooting %. Are you implying that we were in better condition in the 2nd half because we shoot a higher %, than at the start of the game? I guess Bibbs had them running suicides at halftime ;D Guys please...you will only encourage him to respond. ;D
|
|
Freeze
Official BDF member
Posts: 2,342
|
Post by Freeze on Dec 21, 2009 13:57:05 GMT -5
but i do know that we played auburn last year when they were ranked #5 in the country and we only loss to them by 21 points. so its not unreasonable to me to expect us to lose to lsu by less than 30 points LMAO!!! Maybe we can make medals or something to give out to the ladies at the end of the year banquet? Congratulations ladies for not getting blown out by more than 20 to a top ranked program. We are really gaining on them now.... *snicker*For the record....Oleschool thinks we are doing great when we only lose to LSU by 29 or less. Man just stop posting for a while dude and just sit out the next few plays...kay??
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,207
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Dec 21, 2009 15:29:59 GMT -5
:Okay, Oleschool. You say you want to see the ladies perform at their "peak level" and that conditioning is key. Lets say our ladies came in to Baton Rouge to play the #5 ranked LSU Lady Tigers on their home floor (again...a perennial ranked women's program and the only team in the SEC that has challenged the Lady Vols over the last ten years) these are your words, not mine. winning tournament championships and " challenging" are two different things. you don't have to win a tournament championship in order to challenge a team...
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,207
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Dec 21, 2009 15:33:29 GMT -5
but i do know that we played auburn last year when they were ranked #5 in the country and we only loss to them by 21 points. so its not unreasonable to me to expect us to lose to lsu by less than 30 points LMAO!!! Maybe we can make medals or something to give out to the ladies at the end of the year banquet? Congratulations ladies for not getting blown out by more than 20 to a top ranked program. We are really gaining on them now.... *snicker*For the record....Oleschool thinks we are doing great when we only lose to LSU by 29 or less. Man just stop posting for a while dude and just sit out the next few plays...kay?? again, i see you have poor reading skills. as i stated before, it's not so much about how many points you lose by, it's about how you looked in doing so.
|
|
Freeze
Official BDF member
Posts: 2,342
|
Post by Freeze on Dec 21, 2009 16:09:23 GMT -5
it's not so much about how many points you lose by, it's about how you looked in doing so. LMAO!!! Hey Oleschool, I think a coaching position just opened up. You may want to submit an application: In all seriousness....I get what you are trying to say. Just don't say it when we play a team like LSU. Teams like Oklahoma, UConn, Tennessee, Purdue, ect., are the TRUE beat downs unlimited when it comes to womens basketball. No need to make excuses when you play these teams bruh. Most teams are going to get beat down. There is no parity in women's basketball and whether you lose by 20, 30, or 40, teams of our caliber will most certainly lose when it comes to playing teams like LSU. Trying to key in on "conditioning" as the main reason we look so bad against a team like that is silly and holds little traction. But I digress...I hear you....you think we need better conditioned athletes and their performance will be better when playing elite competition like LSU. If that's what you want to believe then you have your right to do so. I'm done.
|
|
Freeze
Official BDF member
Posts: 2,342
|
Post by Freeze on Dec 21, 2009 16:17:49 GMT -5
:Okay, Oleschool. You say you want to see the ladies perform at their "peak level" and that conditioning is key. Lets say our ladies came in to Baton Rouge to play the #5 ranked LSU Lady Tigers on their home floor (again...a perennial ranked women's program and the only team in the SEC that has challenged the Lady Vols over the last ten years) these are your words, not mine. winning tournament championships and " challenging" are two different things. you don't have to win a tournament championship in order to challenge a team... Okay. I was speaking within the context of national dominance. Vanderbilt has 0 final four appearances in the last 10 years. Georgia has 0 final four appearances in the last 10 years. LSU has five, and has been more on the verge of becoming the next SEC team to win a national championship in basketball. No other team from the SEC has won a national championship except Tennessee. But like I said...I digress.
|
|
|
Post by thefriscotxaggie on Dec 21, 2009 20:08:38 GMT -5
Freeze,
Never aswered my question
How many time have you seen the ladies play in person or via the web this season ?
|
|
Freeze
Official BDF member
Posts: 2,342
|
Post by Freeze on Dec 21, 2009 20:54:51 GMT -5
Freeze, Never aswered my question How many time have you seen the ladies play in person or via the web this season ? Once...no wait twice....no wait...I think maybe four times. Oh shoot...I can never keep track of these things. Which answer would you need to attempt to debunk anything I said?? I'm trying to help you out here.
|
|