Maxell
Official BDF member
Director of BDF Marketing
Posts: 12,438
|
Post by Maxell on Sept 12, 2006 1:30:52 GMT -5
From the Associated Press
Chancellor candidate pool cut to five at N.C. A&T Associated Press GREENSBORO, N.C. - A search committee has cut the list of potential candidates for chancellor of N.C. A&T State University from about 100 to five and officials expect to have a new leader for the school by January.
The search committee, led by trustees Chairwoman Velma Speight-Buford, plans to send a list of finalists to the university trustees for their Sept. 20 meeting. The trustees will send a list of three candidates to UNC President Erskine Bowles, who will recommend a finalist for approval by the UNC Board of Governors.
Speight-Buford said the five finalists include candidates with experience leading universities as well as some from the business world.
Former Chancellor James Renick stepped down this year after almost seven years at A&T. Lloyd Hackley has been the school's interim chancellor since May.
|
|
|
Post by captaggie on Sept 12, 2006 8:31:17 GMT -5
Would like to see the three finalists to have an open interview with the students and faculty.
|
|
Maxell
Official BDF member
Director of BDF Marketing
Posts: 12,438
|
Post by Maxell on Sept 12, 2006 10:16:10 GMT -5
Remember A&T won't select the chancellor, Bowles will. So if there was an open interview, it would better be with the five in order to give Bowles the best three. At a minimum, maybe another open forum with the committee(on which there are student and faculty reps). The BOT give him the three candidates with no single recommendation. You can contact the committee below:
If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please email the Chancellor Search Committee at srchcomm@ncat.edu or call toll free at 1.866.518.6792.
|
|
|
Post by Bigboy on Sept 12, 2006 12:16:38 GMT -5
I don't trust Bowles at all and anyone he picks I would not trust them either. And this is only my opinion, but I don't feel that Bowles has A&T's best interest in mind.
|
|
|
Post by A&T AGGIE 96 on Sept 12, 2006 12:43:56 GMT -5
I don't trust Bowles at all and anyone he picks I would not trust them either. And this is only my opinion, but I don't feel that Bowles has A&T's best interest in mind. I don't "know" Bowles, but what has he done that makes you think he doesn't have A&T's best interest in mind? That's the first time I've heard anything like that and would like to get some more feedback if you can give it. I went to the commitee meeting they had in Raleigh for Raleigh-Durham Alumni. There were people there from the seach commitee and the UNC system. It was a great meeting. The Alumni didn't hold back in what they wanted and the search commitee and UNC system reps were very responsive. In fact as I recall the UNC system rep said that Bowles wanted a leader at A&T that was a "big" thinker, fund raiser, and community leader. There were lot's of applicants because the A&T job was concidered a top position in many circles They (UNC system reps) were very aware of A&T's history as an HBCU...and understood what A&T means to Black community in N.C. and around the country.
|
|
|
Post by AggieBorn on Sept 13, 2006 14:05:25 GMT -5
Wasn't Renick a Bowles hire? We're finding out that everything wasn't in order with the Renick Administration but no other HBCU that I can think of has ever experienced the amount of growth that we did in Renicks tenure. Bowles is fine with me.
|
|
|
Post by aggierob on Sept 13, 2006 14:39:16 GMT -5
Renick was hired by Molly Broad, when she was UNC system President. Broad had a big academic background and hired chancellors with similiar backgrounds. Bowles is a businessman and a politician. He is looking for people with business acumen and who can assist universities in being less dependent on the UNC system and tax payers for funding. A lot of Renicks success was connected to the $3 Billion Education Bond passed by voters in 2000. Bowles have been told that the NC General Assembly it is not willing to ask voters to approve a big bond program anytime soon. Therefore, campuses must find other ways to fund projects and programs. I believe this will hurt athletic fundraising at HBCU's. Corporations rather give to academics than athletics unless you are a national champion program.
|
|
Aggie77
Official BDF member
Member Since: September 2004
Posts: 5,571
|
Post by Aggie77 on Sept 13, 2006 20:40:25 GMT -5
Would like to see the three finalists to have an open interview with the students and faculty. An open interview with 7-8k people and what would they do in the end, take a vote like the SGA? I don't see where you are going with that "Cap".
|
|
Aggie77
Official BDF member
Member Since: September 2004
Posts: 5,571
|
Post by Aggie77 on Sept 13, 2006 21:06:26 GMT -5
I don't trust Bowles at all and anyone he picks I would not trust them either. And this is only my opinion, but I don't feel that Bowles has A&T's best interest in mind. I don't "know" Bowles, but what has he done that makes you think he doesn't have A&T's best interest in mind? That's the first time I've heard anything like that and would like to get some more feedback if you can give it. I went to the commitee meeting they had in Raleigh for Raleigh-Durham Alumni. There were people there from the seach commitee and the UNC system. It was a great meeting. The Alumni didn't hold back in what they wanted and the search commitee and UNC system reps were very responsive. In fact as I recall the UNC system rep said that Bowles wanted a leader at A&T that was a "big" thinker, fund raiser, and community leader. There were lot's of applicants because the A&T job was concidered a top position in many circles They (UNC system reps) were very aware of A&T's history as an HBCU...and understood what A&T means to Black community in N.C. and around the country. I don’t trust Erskine Bowles not because he has a hidden agenda, but because he is basically a political appointee with no academic background. However, I don't believe the final decision will actually be made by Erskine Bowles anyway, he may make the announcement, but his decision will be based on a recommendation. That recomdendation comes in form of three people, any one of them capable of leading the University if the selection committee and BOT have done their jobs. So, if we end up with the wrong leader, is it really Erskine Bowels we should blame?
|
|
|
Post by captaggie on Sept 14, 2006 16:25:35 GMT -5
I like the fact that Bowles is a businessman/politican. He brings a different perspective to defining policy (which is heavy on the political side) for the system. I sure there enough Phds on the board, including our own Dr. H. Martin, to account for academic issues.
True, there are representatives on the screening board for the various university constituents. Evenso, these potential CEOs are interviewing us as well. I cannot think of a better way for the final candidates to understand our school's culture than a "question and answer" session with the foundation of the school -- students and faculty.
|
|
|
Post by da heretic on Sept 15, 2006 15:12:13 GMT -5
Good idea, Capt.
|
|