DECKS
Official BDF member
2008 Poster of the Year
Charter Member of the BDF
Posts: 10,405
|
QB ranking
Jul 31, 2023 20:49:24 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by DECKS on Jul 31, 2023 20:49:24 GMT -5
I generally favor starting your most experienced qb. In this situation who would that be? 🤔
|
|
A&T-roy
Official BDF member
Posts: 4,514
|
Post by A&T-roy on Jul 31, 2023 21:17:11 GMT -5
Based on what I've seen:
1. Brick 2. Hook 3. Yeager 4. White
|
|
A&T-roy
Official BDF member
Posts: 4,514
|
Post by A&T-roy on Jul 31, 2023 21:27:51 GMT -5
My ranking 1. ELI Sensation 2. Hooker 3 Yeager 4. Crumble who da hail is crumble? didn't even know he was on the roster. for my money, the starting job should be between hooker and brickhandler. whoever wins that battle during camp should be our starter. i'm not a fan of yeager at all, thought maybe he'd transfer but to my surprise he didn't. nonetheless, we don't have an fcs level fully "experienced" qb on our roster and that scares me. really wouldn't wanna go into a season without a fully experienced qb (not a part time qb) along with a brand new head coach and a brand new offensive system. imo, that spells "struggle". i'd feel less concerned if it wasn't a new offense, but still would be concerned. i was hoping that the "dual threat" juco qb who was on our roster last year would play this season but i guess he moved on to another school. basically, if we cannot get a "consistent" running game going this season, it certainly won't help our starting qb whoever that may be... Based on what one of them said after spring game, the new OC hadn't changed the O much...in order to not create a lot of confusion. Also, from their comments, it sounds like they're gonna be more free to throw all over the field as opposed to the philosophy of not throwing much in the middle of the field with the Broadway & Washington regimes. And I saw more middle & TE throws in the spring practices I saw.
|
|
trues
Official BDF member
Posts: 4,322
|
Post by trues on Aug 1, 2023 14:41:18 GMT -5
Based on what I've seen: 1. Brick 2. Hook 3. Yeager 4. White We finally agree on something LOL
|
|
trues
Official BDF member
Posts: 4,322
|
Post by trues on Aug 1, 2023 14:44:25 GMT -5
i assume he's a preferred walk-on... Sent from my SM-G950U using proboards OldschoolAggie FYI my logo will be changing from Raynard to ELI. LOL
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,205
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Aug 1, 2023 14:56:57 GMT -5
i assume he's a preferred walk-on... Sent from my SM-G950U using proboards OldschoolAggie FYI my logo will be changing from Raynard to ELI. LOL i'm still not sold on "eli". he's still got some "proving" to do for me to buy in. a lot of ya'll got so excited about him because he's a 3star recruit. but remember, ifedi was a 3star recruit too! can't always rely on star ratings. plus, the small number of snaps that "eli" actually took before he got injured didn't really prove anything except he didn't know all of the plays. "twice", on separate occasions, he looked to hand off the football on the opposite side he should've looked to which resulted in 2 "busted" plays. that's a "no, no" for a qb. nobody on the football field should know the playbook better than the qb...
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,205
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Aug 1, 2023 15:05:35 GMT -5
who da hail is crumble? didn't even know he was on the roster. for my money, the starting job should be between hooker and brickhandler. whoever wins that battle during camp should be our starter. i'm not a fan of yeager at all, thought maybe he'd transfer but to my surprise he didn't. nonetheless, we don't have an fcs level fully "experienced" qb on our roster and that scares me. really wouldn't wanna go into a season without a fully experienced qb (not a part time qb) along with a brand new head coach and a brand new offensive system. imo, that spells "struggle". i'd feel less concerned if it wasn't a new offense, but still would be concerned. i was hoping that the "dual threat" juco qb who was on our roster last year would play this season but i guess he moved on to another school. basically, if we cannot get a "consistent" running game going this season, it certainly won't help our starting qb whoever that may be... Based on what one of them said after spring game, the new OC hadn't changed the O much...in order to not create a lot of confusion. Also, from their comments, it sounds like they're gonna be more free to throw all over the field as opposed to the philosophy of not throwing much in the middle of the field with the Broadway & Washington regimes. And I saw more middle & TE throws in the spring practices I saw. even if the new oc does that, its still not "ideal" cuz that means the oc has to "learn" our previous system. how in da hail can the oc do his job "effectively" if he himself has to "learn" another offense? so the players are coaching the coach instead of the coach coaching the players? honestly, i'd rather the players "learn" the oc's offense than the other way around. i think it would've worked better if the players were taught the new offense during spring practice and re-enforced during preseason training camp. the new oc trying to learn the old offense makes it difficult for me see how the oc can take command of an offense that he's "learning". i'd rather the players encounter that learning curve rather than the oc...
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,205
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Aug 1, 2023 15:07:15 GMT -5
I generally favor starting your most experienced qb. In this situation who would that be? 🤔 that would be yeager...
|
|
|
Post by moaggies5 on Aug 1, 2023 15:13:44 GMT -5
To be candid OSA, there has been lots of commentary on this site that was critical of how predictable our playbook was. Methinks that the new OC wouldn't have trouble with "learning" this system. If anything, he could use it as the foundation and build upon it and work toward getting our players comfortable with his terminology. I'm sure as the season progresses there will be wrinkles added based on his comfort level with what he sees in live action.
I don't see it as our players teaching our OC the offense. I'm confident that our OC will build the offense based on the talent and skills he has at his disposal. And I believe Coach Brown has been clear we will adjust to the personnel we have versus the other way around.
|
|
A&T-roy
Official BDF member
Posts: 4,514
|
Post by A&T-roy on Aug 1, 2023 15:44:09 GMT -5
Based on what I've seen: 1. Brick 2. Hook 3. Yeager 4. White We finally agree on something LOL Um, you mean you finally got something right!
|
|
A&T-roy
Official BDF member
Posts: 4,514
|
Post by A&T-roy on Aug 1, 2023 15:56:18 GMT -5
Based on what one of them said after spring game, the new OC hadn't changed the O much...in order to not create a lot of confusion. Also, from their comments, it sounds like they're gonna be more free to throw all over the field as opposed to the philosophy of not throwing much in the middle of the field with the Broadway & Washington regimes. And I saw more middle & TE throws in the spring practices I saw. even if the new oc does that, its still not "ideal" cuz that means the oc has to "learn" our previous system. how in da hail can the oc do his job "effectively" if he himself has to "learn" another offense? so the players are coaching the coach instead of the coach coaching the players? honestly, i'd rather the players "learn" the oc's offense than the other way around. i think it would've worked better if the players were taught the new offense during spring practice and re-enforced during preseason training camp. the new oc trying to learn the old offense makes it difficult for me see how the oc can take command of an offense that he's "learning". i'd rather the players encounter that learning curve rather than the oc... Few things: - The OC should be more advanced in being able to learn offenses. - I'd rather have one person learning than 4. - I expect the basics are the same in terms of RPO offenses, which is what we ran in the practices I saw.
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,205
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Aug 1, 2023 16:01:20 GMT -5
To be candid OSA, there has been lots of commentary on this site that was critical of how predictable our playbook was. Methinks that the new OC wouldn't have trouble with "learning" this system. If anything, he could use it as the foundation and build upon it and work toward getting our players comfortable with his terminology. I'm sure as the season progresses there will be wrinkles added based on his comfort level with what he sees in live action. I don't see it as our players teaching our OC the offense. I'm confident that our OC will build the offense based on the talent and skills he has at his disposal. And I believe Coach Brown has been clear we will adjust to the personnel we have versus the other way around. you make some valid points but i respectfully disagree. you are best at doing things that you already know, that's why the private sector places a premium on "experience". building an offense based on the talent and skills you have at your disposal doesn't mean "changing" your offense. that means to me that your offense can accommodate various talents and skillsets, but the offense itself does not change. i dunno, i just rather start with the oc's base offense from "day 1" if his offense is gonna be the principal offense in the future. cuz there's gotta be a "learning curve" for the oc if he's responsible for using the previous offense or some form of it. whereas, if he uses his own offense, the oc has no learning curve. either way, its difficult to see how our offense will operate like a "well-oiled machine" this season unless its during the latter part of the season...
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,205
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Aug 1, 2023 16:12:30 GMT -5
even if the new oc does that, its still not "ideal" cuz that means the oc has to "learn" our previous system. how in da hail can the oc do his job "effectively" if he himself has to "learn" another offense? so the players are coaching the coach instead of the coach coaching the players? honestly, i'd rather the players "learn" the oc's offense than the other way around. i think it would've worked better if the players were taught the new offense during spring practice and re-enforced during preseason training camp. the new oc trying to learn the old offense makes it difficult for me see how the oc can take command of an offense that he's "learning". i'd rather the players encounter that learning curve rather than the oc... Few things: - The OC should be more advanced in being able to learn offenses. - I'd rather have one person learning than 4. - I expect the basics are the same in terms of RPO offenses, which is what we ran in the practices I saw. yes i agree, the oc "should" be more advanced relative to "learning" a different offense. however, he still has to go thru a "learning curve" nonetheless that most other opposing oc's don't. and sure, its understandable that you'd rather have only one person learning. but the problem with that is that the person who is "learning" also happens to be the "leader and play caller" of our offense. and while "learning" the previous offense, who and how will he be corrected when he makes a mistake? coach mattes? the players? just my opinion, but i think the oc stood a better chance of implementing his own offense during the spring and re-enforcing it during preseason camp than trying to "learn" the old offense and incorporating parts of it into his system. but hey, that's why the coaches make the big bucks. lol, that's for them to figure out...
|
|
saabman
Official BDF member
Posts: 11,812
|
Post by saabman on Aug 1, 2023 17:59:14 GMT -5
Based on what one of them said after spring game, the new OC hadn't changed the O much...in order to not create a lot of confusion. Also, from their comments, it sounds like they're gonna be more free to throw all over the field as opposed to the philosophy of not throwing much in the middle of the field with the Broadway & Washington regimes. And I saw more middle & TE throws in the spring practices I saw. even if the new oc does that, its still not "ideal" cuz that means the oc has to "learn" our previous system. how in da hail can the oc do his job "effectively" if he himself has to "learn" another offense? so the players are coaching the coach instead of the coach coaching the players? honestly, i'd rather the players "learn" the oc's offense than the other way around. i think it would've worked better if the players were taught the new offense during spring practice and re-enforced during preseason training camp. the new oc trying to learn the old offense makes it difficult for me see how the oc can take command of an offense that he's "learning". i'd rather the players encounter that learning curve rather than the oc... I don't believe everything that players say because they can see a similarity with a play that was in their old system and get the idea that things have not changed . A lot of plays are similar but the terminology of the play and the positioning of the players on the field could be different. I think that the OC is and will be implementing his own stamp on this offense. And I don't see Coach Brown as organized as he seems to be, allowing his OC to run the same system as A&T ran last year. I agree with you that doesn't pass the smell test and it's highly unlikely.
|
|
trues
Official BDF member
Posts: 4,322
|
Post by trues on Aug 1, 2023 22:50:09 GMT -5
We finally agree on something LOL Um, you mean you finally got something right! 😆😆😂 to funny
|
|