|
Post by aggie2039 on May 19, 2022 5:13:05 GMT -5
The California State Assembly is in the process of debating and refining SB-1401, which would require the state's colleges and universities to share a portion of their revenue with football and basketball players. Per the LA Times, SB-1401 has centered on football and men's and women's basketball because those are the only three sports where scholarships don't account for 50 percent or more of the revenue generated by that sport. And so the California legislature is zeroing in on that, with the stated goal of boosting graduation rates and building wealth among athlete populations that are majority Black. How would the revenue be split up? From the Times: footballscoop.com/news/new-details-california-bill-sb-1401-change-college-sports-foreverThe amount owed to each athlete would be the half of the sport’s total revenue minus the team’s total student grant-in-aid package divided by the number of players. Let's say USC football generates $50 million a year and spends $10 million on football scholarships. For the entire history of college athletics, USC has kept that remaining $40 million and spent it as it sees fit. If SB-1401 passes as it's currently written, $20 million that has funded Olympic sports and paid administrators' salaries would disappear from the budget and reappear in a fund for Trojans football players. The paper estimates each USC player could earn up to $200,000 per year -- in addition to whatever they garner on the NIL market.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2022 6:57:43 GMT -5
The California State Assembly is in the process of debating and refining SB-1401, which would require the state's colleges and universities to share a portion of their revenue with football and basketball players. Per the LA Times, SB-1401 has centered on football and men's and women's basketball because those are the only three sports where scholarships don't account for 50 percent or more of the revenue generated by that sport. And so the California legislature is zeroing in on that, with the stated goal of boosting graduation rates and building wealth among athlete populations that are majority Black. How would the revenue be split up? From the Times: footballscoop.com/news/new-details-california-bill-sb-1401-change-college-sports-foreverThe amount owed to each athlete would be the half of the sport’s total revenue minus the team’s total student grant-in-aid package divided by the number of players. Let's say USC football generates $50 million a year and spends $10 million on football scholarships. For the entire history of college athletics, USC has kept that remaining $40 million and spent it as it sees fit. If SB-1401 passes as it's currently written, $20 million that has funded Olympic sports and paid administrators' salaries would disappear from the budget and reappear in a fund for Trojans football players. The paper estimates each USC player could earn up to $200,000 per year -- in addition to whatever they garner on the NIL market. I think the Bill passing will quickly flag a SCOTUS hearing as the SEC states wouldn’t be able to compete with USC and UCLA paying their players $25k yearly + an endowment upon graduation.
|
|
|
Post by The Professor on May 23, 2022 22:05:40 GMT -5
Better pray don't nothing like this ever become law
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2022 8:35:50 GMT -5
Better pray don't nothing like this ever become law Oh, you don't know my home state very well, huh? LOL We're nutty. Oddly enough, it's going to be a boon for The Bruins, Trojans, and any other FBS or FCS program that can afford to pay their players out there. The Trojans will rise to the top with a quickness if they can legally pay players.
|
|
|
Post by The Professor on May 24, 2022 9:13:20 GMT -5
Better pray don't nothing like this ever become law Oh, you don't know my home state very well, huh? LOL We're nutty. Oddly enough, it's going to be a boon for The Bruins, Trojans, and any other FBS or FCS program that can afford to pay their players out there. The Trojans will rise to the top with a quickness if they can legally pay players. And for those who can't it will ruin them
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2022 9:43:21 GMT -5
Oh, you don't know my home state very well, huh? LOL We're nutty. Oddly enough, it's going to be a boon for The Bruins, Trojans, and any other FBS or FCS program that can afford to pay their players out there. The Trojans will rise to the top with a quickness if they can legally pay players. And for those who can't it will ruin them If anything, most Cal States and a few UCs would end up dropping athletics or moving down to D3 because of the law.
|
|
|
Post by The Professor on May 24, 2022 10:17:49 GMT -5
And for those who can't it will ruin them If anything, most Cal States and a few UCs would end up dropping athletics or moving down to D3 because of the law. UC , UCLA , USC and Stanford yes. Everyone else goes to D3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2022 10:21:11 GMT -5
If anything, most Cal States and a few UCs would end up dropping athletics or moving down to D3 because of the law. UC , UCLA , USC and Stanford yes. Everyone else goes to D3 Don't forget about Fresno State, San Diego State, and San Jose State in the MWC. Even Cal Poly, UC Davis, and Sac State would be able to manage without dropping down. But everyone else? Yikes.
|
|