oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,192
Member is Online
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 10, 2020 12:08:10 GMT -5
accordingly the reason behind the move is the so called "bottom line", so there's no reason to schedule easier opponents to improve our ooc record because the priority appears to be the "bottom line".
so by minimizing the money games in the future defeats the "bottom line" purpose. there's no financial benefit to weakening our sos in the future...
Sent from my SM-G950U using proboards
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2020 12:55:20 GMT -5
accordingly the reason behind the move is the so called "bottom line", so there's no reason to schedule easier opponents to improve our ooc record because the priority appears to be the "bottom line". so by minimizing the money games in the future defeats the "bottom line" purpose. there's no financial benefit to weakening our sos in the future... Sent from my SM-G950U using proboards If you want an NCAA share, you’ll increase your competition slightly, while avoiding most money games. Besides, I believe the Big South deters against scheduling the way MEAC and SWAC teams schedule, keeping players on the road for 12-14 games.
|
|
|
Post by durhamgsoaggie on Mar 10, 2020 13:03:27 GMT -5
It’s my understanding that we have such a tough out of conference schedule because they are money games used to boost the bottom line. Scheduling that may improve our record may also reduce revenue. We have to find a balance. Once in the Big South, we can schedule games against HBCU squads in November and December in Corbett for revenue. But the reliance on Money Games can be offset by earning an NCAA Tournament Share and by keeping our team APR over a certain mark. Yep. We start stacking academic revenue units that hopefully don't have to be split with the conference @ $282K per year over 6 years... and you ain't worrying about money games anymore. www.ncaa.org/academic-based-revenue-distribution
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,192
Member is Online
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 10, 2020 13:18:53 GMT -5
accordingly the reason behind the move is the so called "bottom line", so there's no reason to schedule easier opponents to improve our ooc record because the priority appears to be the "bottom line". so by minimizing the money games in the future defeats the "bottom line" purpose. there's no financial benefit to weakening our sos in the future... Sent from my SM-G950U using proboards If you want an NCAA share, you’ll increase your competition slightly, while avoiding most money games. Besides, I believe the Big South deters against scheduling the way MEAC and SWAC teams schedule, keeping players on the road for 12-14 games. a share of what? the big south is a "one bid" league just like the meac is and to increase the ncaa payout, the march madness tournament participant must "win games" which the big south has only done "once" in its entire history. the ncaa payout unit for 2020 is roughly $282k per unit which the big south gets as a one bid and historically a "one unit" league, the exact same amount that the meac usually gets. the only way that payout increases is by "winning games" in the tournament. so what share are you talking about? you mean a share of the $282k unit payout that the conference receives from the ncaa which will amount to be peanuts by the time it is split among the conference members?
|
|
|
Post by marchingband1969 on Mar 10, 2020 13:20:11 GMT -5
I'm not a sports research guy so figuring out wins and losts combinations don't excite me. I have a simpler approach to our postseason play... build a darn team that can beat somebody! Recruit guys that can dribble and hit an open jump shot! It's not done very often but HBCU teams can beat folks in the Tournament. So let's build a team that can play no matter where they land on the bracket. By the way, if we do build this type team, we will also beat some OOC teams early in the season.
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,192
Member is Online
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 10, 2020 13:20:39 GMT -5
Once in the Big South, we can schedule games against HBCU squads in November and December in Corbett for revenue. But the reliance on Money Games can be offset by earning an NCAA Tournament Share and by keeping our team APR over a certain mark. Yep. We start stacking academic revenue units that hopefully don't have to be split with the conference @ $250K per year over 6 years... and you ain't worrying about money games anymore. www.ncaa.org/academic-based-revenue-distributionsame thing could equally be done in the meac, ain't got nothing to do with conference affiliation...
|
|
|
Post by durhamgsoaggie on Mar 10, 2020 13:28:39 GMT -5
same thing could equally be done in the meac, ain't got nothing to do with conference affiliation... It's much more likely to occur when your teams aren't travelling nearly as much or having to stay overnight as will be the case with the Big South move. That travel reduction is a big factor in sustaining this revenue aspect.
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,192
Member is Online
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 10, 2020 13:34:09 GMT -5
same thing could equally be done in the meac, ain't got nothing to do with conference affiliation... It's much more likely to occur when your teams aren't travelling nearly as much or having to stay overnight as will be the case with the Big South move. That travel reduction is a big factor in sustaining this revenue aspect. wow, man you can put a "spin" on anything...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2020 13:47:04 GMT -5
It's much more likely to occur when your teams aren't travelling nearly as much or having to stay overnight as will be the case with the Big South move. That travel reduction is a big factor in sustaining this revenue aspect. wow, man you can put a "spin" on anything... So do you.
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,192
Member is Online
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 10, 2020 13:59:31 GMT -5
wow, man you can put a "spin" on anything... So do you. i didn't spin anything, just stated verifiable "facts"...
|
|
|
Post by bseballaggie on Mar 12, 2020 10:07:48 GMT -5
I'm not a sports research guy so figuring out wins and losts combinations don't excite me. I have a simpler approach to our postseason play... build a darn team that can beat somebody! Recruit guys that can dribble and hit an open jump shot! It's not done very often but HBCU teams can beat folks in the Tournament. So let's build a team that can play no matter where they land on the bracket. By the way, if we do build this type team, we will also beat some OOC teams early in the season. I will totally agree with you here, however many of the HBCU losses are not about talent, it’s about offensive and defensive schemes, most HBCU’s traditionally run a 1 dimensional transition offense and do not understand the transition defense, we attempt to win by out talenting the other team,(checkers)! Our offensive playbook is run if they stop your run spread out pass the ball around until you find a open man, then shoot. The playbook is so simple, even a caveman can stop it. We don’t understand how to attack a particular defensive scheme, or use a particular scheme to stop a particular offense! This also the reason why you have a 7 footer sitting your bench most of the game, 1 dimenisional play the best college teams can go 10 deep on the bench! These in game adjustments are what ultimately wins! Coaching!
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,192
Member is Online
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 12, 2020 10:31:33 GMT -5
I'm not a sports research guy so figuring out wins and losts combinations don't excite me. I have a simpler approach to our postseason play... build a darn team that can beat somebody! Recruit guys that can dribble and hit an open jump shot! It's not done very often but HBCU teams can beat folks in the Tournament. So let's build a team that can play no matter where they land on the bracket. By the way, if we do build this type team, we will also beat some OOC teams early in the season. I will totally agree with you here, however many of the HBCU losses are not about talent, it’s about offensive and defensive schemes, most HBCU’s traditionally run a 1 dimensional transition offense and do not understand the transition defense, we attempt to win by out talenting the other team,(checkers)! Our offensive playbook is run if they stop your run spread out pass the ball around until you find a open man, then shoot. The playbook is so simple, even a caveman can stop it. We don’t understand how to attack a particular defensive scheme, or use a particular scheme to stop a particular offense! This also the reason why you have a 7 footer sitting your bench most of the game, 1 dimenisional play the best college teams can go 10 deep on the bench! These in game adjustments are what ultimately wins! Coaching! did you watch our game last night? did you not see our guys executing a half court "flex" offense and that they did not play a lot of "transition" basketball last night? do you realize that the vast majority of head men's basketball coaches in the meac have a "pwc" background rather than an hbcu background? do you think they teach a different brand of fundamentals and half court offenses at pwc's that are kept secret from hbcu's? do you think pwc coaches attend coaching clinics that hbcu coaches can't attend? just sayin'. just curious, why do you feel that pwc coaches are more knowledgeable and more qualified than hbcu coaches? what gives you that impression?
|
|
|
Post by bseballaggie on Mar 12, 2020 12:50:46 GMT -5
I will totally agree with you here, however many of the HBCU losses are not about talent, it’s about offensive and defensive schemes, most HBCU’s traditionally run a 1 dimensional transition offense and do not understand the transition defense, we attempt to win by out talenting the other team,(checkers)! Our offensive playbook is run if they stop your run spread out pass the ball around until you find a open man, then shoot. The playbook is so simple, even a caveman can stop it. We don’t understand how to attack a particular defensive scheme, or use a particular scheme to stop a particular offense! This also the reason why you have a 7 footer sitting your bench most of the game, 1 dimenisional play the best college teams can go 10 deep on the bench! These in game adjustments are what ultimately wins! Coaching! did you watch our game last night? did you not see our guys executing a half court "flex" offense and that they did not play a lot of "transition" basketball last night? do you realize that the vast majority of head men's basketball coaches in the meac have a "pwc" background rather than an hbcu background? do you think they teach a different brand of fundamentals and half court offenses at pwc's that are kept secret from hbcu's? do you think pwc coaches attend coaching clinics that hbcu coaches can't attend? just sayin'. just curious, why do you feel that pwc coaches are more knowledgeable and more qualified than hbcu coaches? what gives you that impression? Because they show it, read my statement again, you’re thumping your chest over one game, historically PWI whoop HBCU’s a...s and it was not always about better talent! Wasn’t you that stated HBC’s will never get past the second round.
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,192
Member is Online
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 12, 2020 14:55:54 GMT -5
did you watch our game last night? did you not see our guys executing a half court "flex" offense and that they did not play a lot of "transition" basketball last night? do you realize that the vast majority of head men's basketball coaches in the meac have a "pwc" background rather than an hbcu background? do you think they teach a different brand of fundamentals and half court offenses at pwc's that are kept secret from hbcu's? do you think pwc coaches attend coaching clinics that hbcu coaches can't attend? just sayin'. just curious, why do you feel that pwc coaches are more knowledgeable and more qualified than hbcu coaches? what gives you that impression? Because they show it, read my statement again, you’re thumping your chest over one game, historically PWI whoop HBCU’s a...s and it was not always about better talent! Wasn’t you that stated HBC’s will never get past the second round. yes, absolutely i stated that hbcu's won't get past the 2nd round and they very likely won't. but i did not state that hbcu's won't get past the 2nd round because we have "inferior" hbcu head coaches. i happen to believe lack of talent due to lack of resources and inferior facilities are the primary reasons why hbcu's don't get past the 2nd round, not because we have inferior hbcu coaches. again, the vast majority of meac coaches have pwc backgrounds as you desire. but why is it that the 2 most successful meac coaches have solely "hbcu" backgrounds? and an interim coach who's background comes primarily from hbcu's finished in 2nd place and beat virtually all of the coaches who have pwc backgrounds. how could that be possible if what you say is true? i'm not trying to be funny nor confrontational. i mean, i honestly wanna know what gives you the impression that pwc coaches "inherently" are superior to hbcu coaches? i'm still waiting on you to explain why pwc coaches are better than hbcu coaches but you still have not provided proof nor an explanation. basically you're saying they're just better and that's it. do you think hbcu coaches can't learn what pwc coaches learn? is that it? i mean, don't just say hbcu coaches are inferior, explain why they're inferior. are you saying hbcu coaches are just dumb, imcompetent, and can't comprehend as well as pwc coaches? is that why you think they're inferior? please help me understand why pwc coaches are better? i have an open mind, i don't agree that pwc coaches are superior to hbcu coaches, but if you can provide a "credible" explanation as to why they are, i'd be willing to change my mind. so please explain what justifies the notion that pwc coaches are "inherently" superior to hbcu coaches? i honestly wanna know...
|
|
|
Post by bseballaggie on Mar 12, 2020 16:21:19 GMT -5
Because they show it, read my statement again, you’re thumping your chest over one game, historically PWI whoop HBCU’s a...s and it was not always about better talent! Wasn’t you that stated HBC’s will never get past the second round. yes, absolutely i stated that hbcu's won't get past the 2nd round and they very likely won't. but i did not state that hbcu's won't get past the 2nd round because we have "inferior" hbcu head coaches. i happen to believe lack of talent due to lack of resources and inferior facilities are the primary reasons why hbcu's don't get past the 2nd round, not because we have inferior hbcu coaches. again, the vast majority of meac coaches have pwc backgrounds as you desire. but why is it that the 2 most successful meac coaches have solely "hbcu" backgrounds? and an interim coach who's background comes primarily from hbcu's finished in 2nd place and beat virtually all of the coaches who have pwc backgrounds. how could that be possible if what you say is true? i'm not trying to be funny nor confrontational. i mean, i honestly wanna know what gives you the impression that pwc coaches "inherently" are superior to hbcu coaches? i'm still waiting on you to explain why pwc coaches are better than hbcu coaches but you still have not provided proof nor an explanation. basically you're saying they're just better and that's it. do you think hbcu coaches can't learn what pwc coaches learn? is that it? i mean, don't just say hbcu coaches are inferior, explain why they're inferior. are you saying hbcu coaches are just dumb, imcompetent, and can't comprehend as well as pwc coaches? is that why you think they're inferior? please help me understand why pwc coaches are better? i have an open mind, i don't agree that pwc coaches are superior to hbcu coaches, but if you can provide a "credible" explanation as to why they are, i'd be willing to change my mind. so please explain what justifies the notion that pwc coaches are "inherently" superior to hbcu coaches? i honestly wanna know... Ole school I’ll let you ponder your conflicting, loaded statements and questions, I have one statement, SHOW ME! I don’t believe MEAC facilities are not sufficient to build that winning team and I have expressed why I feel they haven’t succeeded!
|
|