|
Post by aahhbigboy on Dec 16, 2009 11:39:52 GMT -5
I looked at the box score from last night's game and noticed that Bullock's line score was blank. What's going on here?
Anybody that knows anything about how this works knows that she is supposed to be playing by now. What's going on here?
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Dec 16, 2009 11:42:09 GMT -5
Of course you did. All you look for is problems.
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,207
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Dec 16, 2009 11:57:13 GMT -5
I looked at the box score from last night's game and noticed that Bullock's line score was blank. What's going on here? Anybody that knows anything about how this works knows that she is supposed to be playing by now. What's going on here? man, you take the least amount of information to draw the maximum amount of conclusions. just because bullock's box score row is blank, all of sudden the sky is falling! geesh, i can think of a bunch of scenarios as to why her box score was blank but i'm not gonna jump to conclusions over a box score...
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Dec 16, 2009 11:58:40 GMT -5
Alford didn't play last night either.
|
|
|
Post by aahhbigboy on Dec 16, 2009 12:10:39 GMT -5
I looked at the box score from last night's game and noticed that Bullock's line score was blank. What's going on here? Anybody that knows anything about how this works knows that she is supposed to be playing by now. What's going on here? man, you take the least amount of information to draw the maximum amount of conclusions. just because bullock's box score row is blank, all of sudden the sky is falling! geesh, i can think of a bunch of scenarios as to why her box score was blank but i'm not gonna jump to conclusions over a box score... Yeah, and I'm asking what the problem is. I figured you insiders would know, especially the teacher's pet. She is a key component to this team and should be on the court. Oldeschool, I offered you no conclusions, so I'm not sure what you're referring to, but something about this just doesn't seem right to me.
|
|
|
Post by aahhbigboy on Dec 16, 2009 12:17:27 GMT -5
A starter from last year's team that was playing in her home state last night.............
|
|
|
Post by krazykev on Dec 16, 2009 12:17:59 GMT -5
She cannot play until 2nd Semester
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,207
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Dec 16, 2009 12:21:53 GMT -5
man, you take the least amount of information to draw the maximum amount of conclusions. just because bullock's box score row is blank, all of sudden the sky is falling! geesh, i can think of a bunch of scenarios as to why her box score was blank but i'm not gonna jump to conclusions over a box score... Yeah, and I'm asking what the problem is. I figured you insiders would know, especially the teacher's pet. She is a key component to this team and should be on the court. Oldeschool, I offered you no conclusions, so I'm not sure what you're referring to, but something about this just doesn't seem right to me. you're concluding that there's a "problem" based solely on a box score. that's what i'm referring to. and by the way, i'm not an insider. i simply follow aggie athletics very closely because i luv it! i get the mass majority of my information right here from this message board. so no, i'm not an insider. i live in maryland, man! but i'll tell you who i am concerned about and that would be coulter. her minutes this season has been very limited, like maybe 4 or 5 minutes per game. i thought with her return to the team that she'd be a major contributor. i'm wondering that she possibly has not fully recovered from her injury. my biggest concern is the overall health of the team, primarily deblanc and coulter. but i guess we'll find out more once the conference season goes into full swing. by then, we should have a pretty good idea of who's healthy and who's not, as well as who's eligible and who's not...
|
|
|
Post by aahhbigboy on Dec 16, 2009 12:51:56 GMT -5
She cannot play until 2nd Semester You should be eligible to play when the exams are turned in though, right? I mean, correct me if I'm wrong. lol, as if I had to say that.
|
|
|
Post by aahhbigboy on Dec 16, 2009 12:54:03 GMT -5
Yeah, and I'm asking what the problem is. I figured you insiders would know, especially the teacher's pet. She is a key component to this team and should be on the court. Oldeschool, I offered you no conclusions, so I'm not sure what you're referring to, but something about this just doesn't seem right to me. you're concluding that there's a "problem" based solely on a box score. that's what i'm referring to. and by the way, i'm not an insider. i simply follow aggie athletics very closely because i luv it! i get the mass majority of my information right here from this message board. so no, i'm not an insider. i live in maryland, man! but i'll tell you who i am concerned about and that would be coulter. her minutes this season has been very limited, like maybe 4 or 5 minutes per game. i thought with her return to the team that she'd be a major contributor. i'm wondering that she possibly has not fully recovered from her injury. my biggest concern is the overall health of the team, primarily deblanc and coulter. but i guess we'll find out more once the conference season goes into full swing. by then, we should have a pretty good idea of who's healthy and who's not, as well as who's eligible and who's not... I wasn't referring to you being an insider. There's only one teacher's pet when it comes to the ladies. I specifically point out Bullock b/c she was such a key contributer last year.
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Dec 16, 2009 12:56:07 GMT -5
I prefer the term "faithful disciple".
I am in the process of starting my own new cult. It will be called the Branch Cage-Bibbians.
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,207
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Dec 16, 2009 13:24:48 GMT -5
not saying we'll just sweep through the conference, but assuming we'll get bullock back and the rest of our team is healthy, no way we don't win the meac this year. but we've got to have everybody back and healthy.
famu doesn't scare me anymore because i've watched them play twice and even though they have a good team, if we're healthy, they won't be able to stop us. plus, we have way more depth than they do and their best players are their guards. we can run guards at them all day! especially considering that our best player plays that position.
haven't seen the rest of the league, but with what we have coming back from last year, and tweet now being able to basically not hold back since btj and ab aren't around anymore, plus the emergence of the freshmen, leads me to feel very good going into the conference schedule. and jee sams haven't even busted loose yet!
now, a very good measurement will come tonight when we face lsu. our ladies should be confident and we've got experience at playing against these kinds of teams. but let's be real, lsu is presently ranked #5 in the country! i'm not expecting an upset but if we play well against them, it'll say a lot about how far we've come since the beginning of the season and how far we can go going forward...
|
|
|
Post by aahhbigboy on Dec 16, 2009 16:51:40 GMT -5
We'll need our full stable of guards. We need Bullock pretty bad. She can stretch the defense with her jump shooting ability and that will also help to enhance Tweet's game. We have a load of post players ready to go, so that won't be a problem. I think that all the teams we've beaten have losing records. I just don't want to have to rely on freshman when we play good teams so that's why I'm looking for Bullock. I'm not saying we're done without her, so don't twist my words.
I'm pretty sure Bibbs has a handle on things though. Just wondering what's going on and there are some red flags present that you all are choosing to overlook.
|
|
|
Post by Brandmasta on Dec 16, 2009 17:28:04 GMT -5
I prefer the term "faithful disciple". I am in the process of starting my own new cult. It will be called the Branch Cage-Bibbians. That was funny.
|
|
DECKS
Official BDF member
2008 Poster of the Year
Charter Member of the BDF
Posts: 10,410
|
Post by DECKS on Dec 16, 2009 18:45:26 GMT -5
Ahhhbigboy, I think it was the title of your thread. Regardless, you do bring up an interesting question.
|
|