|
Post by Bornthrilla on Sept 25, 2022 15:40:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Oct 18, 2022 14:04:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by da heretic on Oct 18, 2022 14:28:12 GMT -5
Git da bag
|
|
|
Post by pj on Oct 19, 2022 4:56:50 GMT -5
Go!
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Oct 27, 2022 6:19:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by aggie2039 on Oct 27, 2022 21:21:01 GMT -5
|
|
popdad
Official BDF member
Posts: 1,739
|
Post by popdad on Oct 27, 2022 22:09:30 GMT -5
I can’t believe that I’m saying this, but I’m going to Bojangles sometime soon
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 12, 2023 14:33:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Jan 19, 2023 11:45:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Mar 19, 2023 8:27:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bseballaggie on Mar 19, 2023 9:09:20 GMT -5
LOL, I told you it was $500.
|
|
Maxell
Official BDF member
Director of BDF Marketing
Posts: 12,444
|
Post by Maxell on Mar 20, 2023 12:46:55 GMT -5
Hell, I had to pass Thermodynamics and Organic Chemistry! And I had to decide between gas in the car and a 2-piece at Church's Chicken or walking to UNCG caf. Let that sink in. LOL
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Mar 25, 2023 23:01:44 GMT -5
|
|
Maxell
Official BDF member
Director of BDF Marketing
Posts: 12,444
|
Post by Maxell on Mar 27, 2023 0:58:46 GMT -5
I kinda like that XM(Xavier Meacham) logo.
|
|
|
Post by Bornthrilla on Apr 2, 2023 18:52:46 GMT -5
New NCAA president is tying to sell NIL laws as “consumer protections” for “families and student athletes”
Posted by Mike Florio on April 2, 2023, 2:03 PM EDTThe NCAA keeps struggling to put the NIL horse back in the barn. New NCAA president Charlie Baker has been making the media rounds to sell a new narrative when it comes to name, image, and likeness rules. Baker describes a potential federal NIL law as “consumer protections” for “families and student athletes.” In trotting out his talking points regarding the situation on Sunday’s Meet The Press, Baker repeated his claim that “the only thing that’s true right now about NIL is that everybody lies.” It’s fitting, then, that the NCAA is telling its own lie. It says it wants a federal NIL law (including a standard, uniform NIL contract) to help the families and student athletes, the “consumers” of the transactions. Since when does the NCAA care about anything but NCAA institutions? This is political spin, to put it nicely. Crap from a bull, to put it more bluntly. The NCAA wants Congress to craft a law that gives the NCAA legal cover to impose rules on players who finally have every right to make whatever money they can make from their fame. Good deal, bad deal, no deal; that’s their right to do it. Or to not do it. The NCAA wants Congress to insinuate itself into the transactions because the NCAA no longer can, given successful antitrust litigation against an inherently corrupt business model. Does anyone really think that whatever laws the NCAA would support would be about helping players always get the best possible deals from themselves and their families? Or would the NCAA be trying to put the genie back in the bottle before this new era of NIL takes more of the money that boosters and sponsors would otherwise be giving to the schools? That’s why the NCAA never allowed any of this in the past. There are only so many dollars that boosters can be persuaded to give to quasi-professional sports programs. Every dollar that gets diverted to NIL collectives is one fewer dollar that goes to the schools. Read more: profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/04/02/new-ncaa-president-is-tying-to-sell-nil-laws-as-consumer-protections-for-families-and-student-athletes/
|
|