aggie62
Official BDF member
Three Generations of Aggies
Posts: 2,332
|
Post by aggie62 on Mar 26, 2015 2:22:12 GMT -5
The poll will close on April 30th.
|
|
|
|
Post by marchingband1969 on Mar 26, 2015 9:20:42 GMT -5
So far the two schools that believe they have the best chance to win the MEAC this season have the most votes so far. Up until we ran into NCCU in our final game, I thought we had the best team. I think we will be stronger in 2015 and NCCU reportely had a great recruiting year. So I'm looking forward to rooting for my Aggies (or god forbid them Eagles) in Atlanta on December 19th. Either way I plan to be there.
|
|
bluehaze
Official BDF member
Posts: 5,992
|
Post by bluehaze on Mar 26, 2015 9:28:47 GMT -5
I live in Atlanta, so me and my family will be there regardless of the representatives from the conference. However, I fully expect to be on the 50 yard line rooting for the Aggies hopefully against Grambling.
|
|
DECKS
Official BDF member
2008 Poster of the Year
Charter Member of the BDF
Posts: 10,393
Member is Online
|
Post by DECKS on Mar 26, 2015 10:45:18 GMT -5
Where's the option for "none of the above"?
|
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,161
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 26, 2015 11:28:56 GMT -5
now i know exactly how the tea party feels relative to “obamacare”. we’re having this “quitters bowl” shoved down our throats and can’t do anything about it, not a good feeling.
yes, i know how the tea party feels but i’m not gonna attempt to “sabotage” the quitters bowl like the tea party has attempted to sabotage “obamacare”. instead, i just won’t go. ya’ll enjoy yourselves in atlanta, hope you have fun. meanwhile, i’ll watch it on tv if a&t plays only because i’ll watch a&t play anybody. but i won’t spend my hard earned money to support a bowl game made for “losers”.
i suppose this poll does not give folk who oppose this “quitters bowl” an option to vote for. so i’ll treat this poll the same way i will treat the “quitters bowl”, i simply won’t participate...
|
|
bluehaze
Official BDF member
Posts: 5,992
|
Post by bluehaze on Mar 26, 2015 12:37:12 GMT -5
LOL!! Obamacare is actually a perfect analogy. It actually works and is good for the country, but beacause of the media and people against the messanger there is foolish resistance by the people who stand the most to gain.
|
|
|
|
Post by numberonebrave on Mar 26, 2015 12:41:21 GMT -5
NCAT v Alcorn State Cohen and Gibbs on the same field, you know I would not miss it
|
|
|
|
Post by Aggie Monster on Mar 26, 2015 13:03:28 GMT -5
LOL!! Obamacare is actually a perfect analogy. It actually works and is good for the country, but beacause of the media and people against the messanger there is foolish resistance by the people who stand the most to gain. LOL |
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,161
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 26, 2015 13:59:00 GMT -5
LOL!! Obamacare is actually a perfect analogy. It actually works and is good for the country, but beacause of the media and people against the messanger there is foolish resistance by the people who stand the most to gain. indeed, lol! but are you suggesting that the tea party has the most to gain from "obamacare"? how so? perhaps the insurance companies have a lot to gain given that obamacare created approximately 12 million new customers for them. but no, i think the uninsured (low income people) had the most to gain from obamacare, not the tea party and "definitely" not their constituents. tea party constituents have always had health insurance because they make the big bucks and have always been able to afford it, they don't see an advantage to having obamacare. but the insurance companies love and hate obamacare. they love it because obamacare creates millions of new customers for them. yet, they hate it because obamacare forces them to do things they don't want to do (because of costs) such as insuring folks who have pre-existing illnesses, not being able to kick folk off of their insurance to save costs, no monetary limits on costs to treat an illness, et cetera. so i think the biggest winners are low income folk who mostly support obamacare. however, i do see some benefits for tea party constituents, but i don't think they gained the most... |
|
Maxell
Official BDF member
Director of BDF Marketing
Posts: 12,431
|
Post by Maxell on Mar 26, 2015 14:13:14 GMT -5
Next question. Would you watch it on TV? That's what ESPN cares about. Honestly, I would watch it on TV with every team but Del St and Savannah St.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aggie Monster on Mar 26, 2015 14:15:59 GMT -5
Next question. Would you watch it on TV? That's what ESPN cares about. Honestly, I would watch it on TV with every team but Del St and Savannah St. If A&T plays I'm going live. If they dont, I'm watching on TV no matter who it is. |
|
bluehaze
Official BDF member
Posts: 5,992
|
Post by bluehaze on Mar 26, 2015 14:52:05 GMT -5
LOL!! Obamacare is actually a perfect analogy. It actually works and is good for the country, but beacause of the media and people against the messanger there is foolish resistance by the people who stand the most to gain. indeed, lol! but are you suggesting that the tea party has the most to gain from "obamacare"? how so? perhaps the insurance companies have a lot to gain given that obamacare created approximately 12 million new customers for them. but no, i think the uninsured (low income people) had the most to gain from obamacare, not the tea party and "definitely" not their constituents. tea party constituents have always had health insurance because they make the big bucks and have always been able to afford it, they don't see an advantage to having obamacare. but the insurance companies love and hate obamacare. they love it because obamacare creates millions of new customers for them. yet, they hate it because obamacare forces them to do things they don't want to do (because of costs) such as insuring folks who have pre-existing illnesses, not being able to kick folk off of their insurance to save costs, no monetary limits on costs to treat an illness, et cetera. so i think the biggest winners are low income folk who mostly support obamacare. however, i do see some benefits for tea party constituents, but i don't think they gained the most... There are alot of people in the "tea party" that aren't making the "big bucks" just like all of the people who vote republican every year. There's a Jimmy Kimmel skit that shows people who love what the Affordable Health Care Act provides, but hate ObamaCare. |
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,161
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 26, 2015 15:00:30 GMT -5
Next question. Would you watch it on TV? That's what ESPN cares about. Honestly, I would watch it on TV with every team but Del St and Savannah St. if a&t is not playing, i'd probably dvr the game and watch some of it whenever convenient, but not all of it. heck, i watch some of the swac regular season games on espnu just like i watch all meac games simply because i'm a "sports geek". i'll watch almost any football game that i'm interested in. i dvr the bayou classic and the scg almost every year, but i usually don't watch the entire game. so i'll watch the quitters bowl on tv, just because i'm a sport geek. but i'll only watch the entire game if a&t plays... |
|
oleschoolaggie
Official BDF member
2009 Poster of the Year, 2009 Most Knowledgeable Poster
Posts: 24,161
|
Post by oleschoolaggie on Mar 26, 2015 15:04:41 GMT -5
There are alot of people in the "tea party" that aren't making the "big bucks" just like all of the people who vote republican every year. actually, that's 100% true. you make a good point, but the majority of tea party constinuents make darn good money. low income tea party folks are a minority... |
|
|
|
Post by ohsixrain on Mar 27, 2015 13:35:20 GMT -5
Loser's bowl, quitter's bowl...WOW!!! I guess our fore-fathers & mothers that chose the Black Panthers and/or the Nation of Islam movement because, they didn't want to go the non-violent route were quitters too. While it was a good cause, some folk didn't find it practical in nature and chose a route to fight for their rights but, protecting themselves simultaneously. But anyway, that's off topic. If you are opposed to this game, that's fine, but to call it a quitter's and/or loser's bowl is just wrong. So, just because, you don't agree doesn't make it so. So, it sounds like the only one that quitting is you...oleschool.
|
|
